• Ooops@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I’d use “webmaster@”, which is a pretty long-running convention

    Another option is looking for the security.txt (toplevel or under .well-known/) of a site (that’s RFC 9116, which should have a Contact field with a mailto:<contact address> field (although tel:<number> and https://<contact information page> are allowed, too, although far less common).

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Yeah, he mentioned security.txt in the article, but complained that few implemented it.

      I guess that even if someone who apparently does computer security isn’t familiar with it, that Average Joe probably has no idea. Maybe there’s an argument that there should be some sort of Web browser support for “report problem with this page/site” that sends an email to an appropriate address with an URL for the page and comment so that people are more aware of it.

      • Ooops@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        13 hours ago

        but complained that few implemented it

        Now that you mention it… I decided to check our lemmy instances and both lemmy.today and feddit.org have a robots.txt (of course^^) but no security.txt *sigh*

        Yours didn’t even bother to fill out the /legal page (which should also have contact information) although it’s a fixed part of the lemmy software with a link at the bottom of the site.