Good thing I’ve never used, nor will I ever, use that garbage platform!

Bitwarden

No idea. I haven’t heard of EAC until now.

I’ve used this for many years. Excellent software.

It was more than just notifications as it has been pointed out by another user in this thread

How is this story fake?

Please remember to be(e) nice when using Beehaw.

This probably will end up being the case for most people

Wouldn’t that be refreshing?

https://archive.ph/hEkJp

There are other TikTok alternatives worth mentioning:

• Skylight
• Loops

I’m sorry to hear that. Very sad.

Their software is getting less stable with each release, while the amount of crammed in features is going up.

I agree that you may be having this personal experience. On the other hand, I am not and have been using iOS for many years. The difference could be that I intentionally stay very informed about iOS.

I, personally, will not throw the baby out with the bathwater.

However, if you believe that you will have better experiences using Android, then please make the switch.

Back in 2007 (After many years of making a career out of using Microsoft/Windows products) I started using Linux and MacOS/iOS exclusively and have never looked back.

I have very little experience and/or knowledge of Android. So, I can’t comment on that.

Would you, please, explain why you are considering switching from iOS to Android?

There is Loops and Skylight.

I used to love that software!

The general public truly are lazy consumer idiots, aren’t they?

Yes, of course they are!

*write

I agree. I grew up using hard copy encyclopedias at libraries. It is incredible now to have all of this at our fingertips at home.

Can you give an example of an article with an error that you tried to correct?

This was 6 years ago so I cannot recall precisely which pages. However, I just skimmed over about 15 pages that I thought would be riddled with errors. To my surprise, I only found one instance where there was a ‘citation needed’ mark and could find no major errors…maybe a few little splitting hairs examples but nothing serious.

So, it appears that improvements have been made over the past 6 years. On the other hand, I only looked over roughly 15 pages.

Probably the same caution would be true for any encyclopedia. Namely, these can be pretty good starting points but not for serious scholarly research.