How do they even plan on enforcing this? What would possibly be the consequences for either parent or child if they violate?

  • Bandicoot_Academic@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    On one hand preventing kids from developing a social media addiciton is good. On the other this law will probably cause a lot of issues. Some issues that i can think of on the spot are:

    1. How exactly do you verify age. Kids can just lie about it and social media platforms requiring a national ID is a stupidly bad idea just from the privacy concerns. I don’t want every website to have my ID because:

      A. This would make tracking people between platforms much easier.

      B. One data leak from one website and milions of people have their govt IDs available on-line along with names, phone numbers, e-mail addreses and possibly even addresses (from billing information) and answers to security questions (from posts)

    2. I’m worried that this will cause a lot of social media platforms to go the way that youtube went, ie. no NSFW, swearing or anything even remotly not kid-friendly.

  • minode@szmer.info
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    What would possibly be the consequences for either parent or child if they violate?

    If the law designed is any good, there should be none. The responsibility to check whether the parent has agreed should be laid on the social media giants, not the child or the parent. It should be a tool for parents to control the social media consumption of their kids. And after reading the article, which I highly recommend, it seems to be the case:

    The broad law comes with heavy burdens for online platforms. It requires basically any digital services provider that collects an email at sign-up to conduct age verification to identify all minors, verify parents or guardians connected to all minors identified, and secure parental consent for a wide range of account activity.

    Please read the articles that you post. Asking follow-up questions that are already answered is a little stupid.

  • honk@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    How would you even enforce that?

    Of course every parent should have an idea of their kids are doing on the internet or at least educate their kids to such a degree that they don’t require supervision and can be trusted use the internet responsibly. But that is just common sense and should fall in to the general responsibilities of a parent.

  • Xariphon@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is just as useless as requiring people to be a certain age to access your web site. Everybody on the internet was born January 01, 1901 and everybody’s real name is Batman Bin Suparman until proven otherwise.

    Also, the last thing we need is even more ways to exclude young people from society. I mean, who looks at young people and thinks “you know what would make this lonely, overworked, overstressed, hyper-regulated cohort better? MORE ISOLATION!” ?

  • bdiddy@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is so stupid. If we are going to regulate social media companies it needs to be done at the national level. I’d say their age should be voluntary and if it’s a minor then yeah the algorithms should be cognizant of that. But that needs to be a national bill.

    I do hope that these social media companies respond by just shutting down in these states. Even as someone who is unfortunate enough to live in Texas.

    Hopefully they use their ridiculous amount of power to show Texas legislators who is actually in charge.