• supersquirrel@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Google is bluffing hard here, at the end of the day they won’t give the opportunity to anyone else.

  • Steve@communick.news
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    Chicago schools should really contact Kagi. They announced they would be willing to work with schools that wanted out of Google’s AI experience for their students.

    • XLE@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      16 minutes ago

      Maybe Kagi could first walk back their AI-first manifesto…

      …or start offering plans that don’t force you to pay for their AI folly…

      …Or schools could use literally anything else that doesn’t cost an extra subscription.

      • Kaul@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 hours ago

        This article is about 7 years old, before AI was even used as widely as it is now, and it’s referencing their optional AI tool. This doesn’t strike me as “AI-First” but more like “we’re trying to make our AI search assistant more reliable than the rest”.

        I get the AI hate and the “paid search” Kagi hate, but saying they’re an AI-First company doesn’t seem right to me. You don’t even get AI results unless you add a question mark to your search. Additionally, you can report websites and images for being slop. Can’t do that with any other search engine.

        • XLE@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          17 minutes ago

          Kagi doesn’t offer an AI-free plan.

          The only way to avoid paying for AI is to avoid Kagi. That’s the only “option” they offer.

      • Steve@communick.news
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Schools shouldn’t ever use tools that interrupt a lesson with an ad.
        And we don’t know how much (if anything) it costs the school. It certainly doesn’t cost the student a subscription if that’s what you mean.

        • XLE@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 minutes ago

          Why should tax dollars be funneled from one AI-focused company to another?

          Especially this one.

          If ads on school computers are a problem, great, let’s just drop the whole internet from them.

    • ranandtoldthat@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I’m not really a fan of Kagi myself. I gave it a try a while back. The issue is that with a limited number of searches I get worse results, because I’m less willing to refine my queries.

      With query refinement I can get excellent results on Google. So ultimately Google is better for me than Kagi.

    • takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      I started using them 2 weeks ago. Previously I was using DDG, occasionally when searching and didn’t get an answer I added “!g” to query which redirected me to Google, but I don’t think in those scenarios Google ever had better results.

      With Kagi I so far did not have need to go to Google or DDG at all.

      I also like that I’m in charge. For example I wanted to avoid buying from Amazon. Unfortunately it is not enough to not use their site, because they also show up on top of search results. I can select their service and deprioritize them so now I see other stores when searching for a product.

      So far I’m sold.

      Google was great 2000-2010, but it got worse, supposedly by SEO manipulations, but I also heard (maybe it was Cory Doctorow) that actually because they are making money on ads they actually have incentive to not provide the best results as they want us to spend more time on their site.

  • robert@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    13 hours ago

    There is no need to use Google products of any kind in a classroom setting. It doesn’t help kids learn.

  • Ooops@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    "Oh no! I can’t use the Google search anymore!! How will I survive this???"
    *just opens one of the dozens of alternatives, one of the dozen of meta search engines using Google results, too, or even just putting up their own meta search*

    I’m used to legislators being idiots with zero understanding of tech (usually demonstrated by yet another totally effective dns block) but Google is a f***ing tech company and should understand how well they can block someone from using their publically available internet service.

    And that’s all before even discussing if losing Google AI search can be called a loss at all…