• Default_Defect@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Couldn’t be me. Another me existing would only mean my family wouldn’t have to mourn me, but I couldn’t just accept death because of it.

      • be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        He wouldn’t exist. A copy of him that they could not distinguish would exist. He’d be dead.

        If you say that doesn’t matter to you, fine, but I don’t think it’s hard to grasp why a lot of folks wouldn’t be OK with it, especially as a daily form of transportation.

        • FfaerieOxide@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          If any entity that affects the world in the exact way I would is affecting the world the way I would have it affected, “I” exist.

          My dreams, memories, hopes, and desires propagate through what we call existence and there is zero difference if i was stored in a computer for a little while and or there is two of me.

      • Default_Defect@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        That was part of my point. It would be one less thing to worry about, my family doesn’t suffer the loss, but it doesn’t change that I wouldn’t just let myself die because of it.