The exchange is about Meta’s upcoming ActivityPub-enabled network Threads. Meta is calling for a meeting, his response is priceless!

  • tikitaki@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    It doesn’t need to be said that Meta is purely driven by profit - that is any corporation. But Meta is incompetent and failing - yet still a behemoth. If they want to pour millions of dollars into the fediverse, then we don’t we let them? They would presumably just be another site on the fediverse.

    I totally support them joining on assuming it doesn’t change the fundamental structure of the system.

    • argv_minus_one@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      If they want to pour millions of dollars into the fediverse, then we don’t we let them?

      Because, if we do, they will destroy it.

      • tikitaki@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        ok i’m not saying they won’t but i’ve asked this before and nobody seems to be able to provide some mechanism by which they would destroy it

        is the system not federated? if meta starts acting up, can’t everyone just defederate them? this is what i’m not getting

        if someone can explain to me what exactly is dangerous, i would appreciate

        • argv_minus_one@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          ok i’m not saying they won’t but i’ve asked this before and nobody seems to be able to provide some mechanism by which they would destroy it

          Read up on how they destroyed XMPP.

          is the system not federated?

          So was XMPP. That’s why they’re a huge threat to the Fediverse: they have experience in destroying federated systems.

          • Bloonface@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Facebook didn’t “destroy” XMPP. XMPP was a tiny messaging protocol nobody used, Facebook picked it up for a bit, stopped using it after a while, and then XMPP returned to being a tiny messaging protocol nobody used.

            People are acting like Jabber was hot shit when Facebook picked it up, and its present state of irrelevance is because of big bad Zuck. No, no fucker used Jabber and it saw basically no mainstream adoption until Facebook and Google got involved, and as soon as Facebook and Google weren’t involved (as it turns out that XMPP actually kind of sucks and its unique features are things end users don’t care about) it returned to being a complete irrelevance. A well-intentioned irrelevance, to be sure, but an irrelevance.

            Fediverse is the same, mutans mutandis. We’re tiny. I know it’s nice for us to psyche ourselves up and say that we’re going to destroy the big bad corporate media! but in reality we are a niche constellation of social networks that has literally 0.1% of Facebook’s user base and whose adoption has been, shall we say, not stellar.

            • argv_minus_one@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Not stellar? We’re having this conversation, aren’t we? This place has proven to be an able replacement for Reddit, and the last thing I want to see is it become irrelevant because of Meta’s involvement.

              • Bloonface@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Not stellar? We’re having this conversation, aren’t we?

                The fact that I (nerd that knows all sorts of shit about fedi and is interested in tech topics) am able to use Kbin/fedi to converse with other nerds that know about fedi and are interested in tech does not mean that the fediverse is a storming success.

                I can have a conversation with one other person using tin cans and string. This does not mean that tin cans and string are the future of telecommunications.

                In reality the people who I have tried to get on here who do not fall in that category were either disinterested from the start, were turned off by the complexity of how it works or stopped coming on it when it turned out there was nothing for them here.

                • nameless_prole@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I haven’t really messed with Lemmy at all yet, but Kbin is almost exactly like signing up for/using reddit. if you can use reddit, you can figure out Kbin very easily.

        • TheSaneWriter@vlemmy.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I figured I’ll write up a tldr on Embrace, Extend, Extinguish in case you aren’t really feeling reading the articles.

          Embrace: Meta builds a federated Twitter/Reddit alternative, potentially called Threads but is right now P92, that follows the ActivityPub standard almost perfectly. Various Lemmy and KBin instances federate with them and share information. Users from Facebook and Instagram flood into P92, making it one of the largest instances.

          Extend: P92 starts adding nice, but proprietary features to their system. The allure of these features begins drawing users off of other instances to P92. Those instances are upset, but Meta insists it’s doing nothing wrong, continues to follow the ActivityPub standard in some form, and tells the other instances to just implement the features themselves.

          Extinguish: Meta announces that due to incompatibility, they are withdrawing from the standard and defederating from everyone. Most users of this software are now on P92, and thus don’t mind. Meta gets a fully populated Twitter/Reddit alternative, and the remaining ActivityPub instances wither. Without user support, the standard fails, and a new open source alternative is created to replace it.

          That strategy has been used to kill other open source protocols, and many people are worried it will happen again. My personal opinion is that servers should only federate with Meta if they follow the standard perfectly, and if they deviate even a little bit they should be universally defederated via software changes, but I’m sympathetic to the people that would rather be proactive than reactive.

          • tikitaki@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I understand the concept of embrace extend extinguish

            i just don’t see a significant chunk of fediverse user giving up on open source instances and flocking to Meta’s instance. I can’t imagine what kind of features they could add that could accomplish this. Sure, they could make a site that’s more polished but if Meta enters the game, we’re going to be seeing a huge influx of both users and development. open source alternatives will likely be very close in parity

            i think when considering this whole situation we need to calculate the potential positives and calculate if it’s worth the risks - and those positives include huge amounts of money and people. this could be enough to push the fediverse to the next level of adoption… the dream of having a decentralized social media system could become the standard in such a future.

        • nameless_prole@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          So, because us laymen can’t think of exactly how they would do it, that means it’s not possible?

          The best (and often only) indicator of future behavior is past behavior. And if we go on that, I think we all know how Meta looks.

          • tikitaki@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            you reduced my comment and favorited your own. lol

            look - nobody has given me a concrete mechanism by which they could do damage. neither on here nor on mastodon where I’ve had similar conversations. @thesanewriter was the only one who attempted to give some sort of method - and his was that Meta’s platform could become so popular it steals users. That to me isn’t really unique to the fediverse

            I’m not gonna hop over to Meta’s platform just because it’s nice and shiny.

            But look at the potential benefits of Meta investing heavily into the fediverse… we’re talking millions and millions of dollars in development. i say milk meta for all they are worth, they’re a failing company anyway, this is a desperate attempt on their part

          • Bloonface@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            That article has been posted several times and does not explain how Google “destroyed” XMPP - it assumes that XMPP was some hot shit everyone was using before Google and Facebook picked it up, when in reality it was used by next to nobody, most people who used it with Google or Facebook were just using it to talk to other Google or Facebook users, XMPP doesn’t support a lot of features that consumers now expect in messaging, and since Google and Facebook dropped it it has returned to being a niche FOSS thing - only now its advocates blame Google and Facebook for its failure rather than the fact it’s not a very good protocol and nobody uses it.