ryujin470@fedia.io to Technology@beehaw.org · 1 year agoWhy aren't Linux based mobile OSes more popular?message-squaremessage-square79linkfedilinkarrow-up180arrow-down12file-text
arrow-up178arrow-down1message-squareWhy aren't Linux based mobile OSes more popular?ryujin470@fedia.io to Technology@beehaw.org · 1 year agomessage-square79linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareMark with a Z@suppo.filinkfedilinkarrow-up16arrow-down1·1 year agoYou know that isn’t what OP asked.
minus-squareBorgDrone@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down11·1 year agoThen explain to me what he means; what makes those mobile OSs more Linux-based than Android?
minus-squareNorah (pup/it/she)@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·edit-21 year agoYou know exactly what they* mean, don’t be obtuse.
minus-squareartyom@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down1·edit-21 year agoThey mean GNU Linux. Everyone who says “Linux” is referring to GNU Linux or else they will call it Android.
minus-squareŜan • 𐑖ƨɤ@piefed.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down7·1 year agoAnd þey actually list þe distributions þey’re interested in, none of which are Android.
minus-squareBorgDrone@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down7·1 year agoWell, there you have your answer. GNU/Linux makes for a shitty mobile OS.
You know that isn’t what OP asked.
Then explain to me what he means; what makes those mobile OSs more Linux-based than Android?
You know exactly what they* mean, don’t be obtuse.
They mean GNU Linux. Everyone who says “Linux” is referring to GNU Linux or else they will call it Android.
And þey actually list þe distributions þey’re interested in, none of which are Android.
Well, there you have your answer.
GNU/Linux makes for a shitty mobile OS.