TikTok’s bid to overturn a law which would see it banned or sold in the US from early 2025 has been rejected.

The social media company had hoped a federal appeals court would agree with its argument that the law was unconstitutional because it represented a “staggering” impact on the free speech of its 170 million US users.

But the court upheld the law, which it said “was the culmination of extensive, bipartisan action by the Congress and by successive presidents”.

[…]

The court agreed the law was “carefully crafted to deal only with control by a foreign adversary, and it was part of a broader effort to counter a well-substantiated national security threat posed by the PRC (People’s Republic of China).”

  • CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    “Free markets” is a complete farce. The only free markets are in places where no government exists like Somalia. In a true free market, anyone could take over a business by sheer force since no laws would be there to protect them.

    • orcrist@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 days ago

      That’s not what the term means. It is a historical term with a precise meaning, and that meaning is not synonymous with “unregulated”.

      • CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        I get the joke but it still doesn’t exist for anyone that matters. You see free markets, you attack violently