• arthur@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    That will become necessary soon, since their “business model” lost it’s meaning after the LLM’s

    • rainh@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      Lol I doubt it. LLMs are useless for the kinds of questions stack overflow is useful for.

      • fuzzywolf23@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        And no SO means worse LLMs. Chatgpt relies on scrapes of SO, reddit, forums and GitHub discussion pages.

        • arthur@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          And the scrapping stage already happened. A new one will be useful only after enough human-made content is added, or it a major change in tech happen.

        • smoothbrain coldtakes@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s not like ChatGPT is the only LLM. GPT is pretty broad and general. Remember that MS has Co-Pilot which is literally entirely built on GitHub’s codebase knowledge. Different data sets will produce different kinds of useful predictors.

      • smoothbrain coldtakes@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve had great success with LLMs troubleshooting my code independently without needing to consult a peer.

        It’s easier than looking on StackOverflow because it already crawled the answers there and it’s been programmed to drop the sass unless you ask it to be sassy specifically. All the knowledge without the elitism.