Be the change you want to see ✨🌈
Be the change you want to see ✨🌈
Draft
and write in the description that management says this should not be merged until the site breaks.So… How are things at work?
This is what I imagine the Reddit developers think of themselves as. 😆
everything I’ve seen for radarr, sonarr, overseerr, etc. require docker
Back when I was using Sonarr a couple years ago before that really good free tracker died, I wasn’t using docker at all. Just a systemd unit for the server and one for the web interface I believe, or maybe just the one for both. I’m on Arch.
I hope that helps.
Keep the database on an SSD. I put mine on a HDD and it corrupted.
That seems very odd to me, and a very serious bug, no? 🤨 I feel like the storage medium shouldn’t matter as long as it can keep up with data throughput (or eventually keep up, with some help with buffering via the kernel or some other mechanism).
pass the gpu into the container
Man, if the “Download more RAM!” scammers of old could see us now.
but I’m super disenchanted on docker after this thread if I’m being honest
What made you feel that way? (I’m not too familiar with docker much tbh and I’m thinking of hosting on a Pi just like you.)
I thought IIFE’s usually looked like (function (...params) {})(...args)
. That’s not the latest way? To be honest I never used them much, at least not after arrow functions arrived.
lol, you’d really have to go out of your way in this scenario. First implement a way to get every single permutation of a list, then to ahead with the asinine solution. 😆 But yes, nice one! Your imagination is impressive.
So there’s yet another level of quirkery to this bullshit then, it seems. 😆 Nice digging! 🤝
I also noticed that if you surround the curlies with parentheses, you get the same again:
> eval('{} + []')
0
> eval('({}) + []')
'[object Object]'
I guess, yeah, that’ll do it. Although that’d probably be yet one or a few extra factors involving n.
In node, I get the same result in both cases. "[object Object]"
It’s calling the toString()
method on both of them, which in the array case is the same as calling .join(",")
on the array. For an empty array, that results in an empty string added to "[object Object]"
at either end in the respective case in the picture.
Not sure how we’d get 0 though. Anybody know an implementation that does that? Browsers do that maybe? Which way is spec compliant? Number([])
is 0, and I think maybe it’s in the spec that the algorithm for type coercion includes an initial attempt to convert to Number before falling back to toString()
? I dunno, this is all off the top of my head.
Ah yes, mongo and document databases, forgot about those. Yeah those could be a pain to get data from if there’s no structure. 😅
as long as it’s organized in some way
Right? Organized, structured, same thing, or? A database can’t have no structure, right? I don’t even know how one would create such a database.
My mental model of it is a chain, yes. But you can define it however you like. It’s just steps in some direction.
Maybe a cake would suit someone the best.
Exactly. For every level of abstraction, the abstractor is the high level and the abstractee is the lower level. Those aren’t real words perhaps, but you get what I’m saying. It’s all relative along the chain of abstraction.
How in the hell does anyone f— up so bad they get O(n!²)? 🤯 That’s an insanely quickly-growing graph.
Curious what the purpose of that algorithm would have been. 😅
You can make an unstructured database? I thought the S in SQL stood for “structured”, that it was built into the language itself or something.
Yeah my joke was kind of partly inspired by the drawthefuckingowl meme. Step 1 would be the owl lol.