![](https://infosec.pub/pictrs/image/2e041e82-a886-4f73-9b85-4c947e84dc2c.png)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/2QNz7bkA1V.png)
My thoughts: I don’t care! I am very happy with Lemmy and Kbin, so not going back there, thay can do whatever!
Tech Pro - Hobby Aviator - VR Enthusiast - Homelab Selfhoster - AI Prompt Hacker errr I mean Engineer 🇵🇷🧑🏻💻🛫🥽🤖 https://techviator.com
My thoughts: I don’t care! I am very happy with Lemmy and Kbin, so not going back there, thay can do whatever!
Tailscale uses the Wireguard protocol (in userspace, not kernel) along with a user and IP management system, a STUN system and a relay so they can provide easy management and connectivity even behind NAT or CGNAT. The relay uses https headers to hide the traffic, which provides a slower connection but allows connectivity in networks that block UDP or VPN traffic.
Installing a Wireguard server would use a kernel implementation of the WG protocol, but you have to open a port on the server side for it, and manually create the peer configuration and public/private keys for them. It is slightly faster, but not as easy to deploy or as versatile when dealing with complicated networks, dual NAT or CGNAT. Also very easy to block on networks as it does not obfuscates the traffic.
I chose to deploy a Wireguard server because it works well for my needs, but if I was behind CGNAT or connected through restrictive networks I would move to Tailscale.
Xwitter by Musk - the best social media in all 4 corners of this Flat Earth! Starting at $8* per month.
*Basic plan has a limit of 50 xweets per month.