They basically want free labor.
They basically want free labor.
Lol. Git itself can act as a server over the git protocol. Might have been easier 🤪
There’s plenty of git forges that aren’t GitHub. Git itself has nothing to do with central servers and can theoretically be used in a completely decentralized manner.
Ah right. What I really meant to ask was if it can do protocols other than http.
Which I don’t think it can…
Are you able to tunnel ports other than 80 and 443 through Cloudflare?
Definitely a good way to do it. Photoprism supports uploading to WebDAV for sharing. Could front a CDN upload with a web dav server 🤔
Yeah, that sounds like a good idea. I am using photoprism for photo management. It doesn’t really support S3 or any CDN. You could use a fuse filesystem or something, but it’s very slow.
Where are you uploading galleries? Just your own HDD connected to a static website?
Depends on the language. There is no explicit typing in JavaScript, for example. That’s why Typescript was invented.
But wouldn’t you calculate the time in the future in the right time zone and then store it back as UTC?
Tasks.org syncs with various services. Those services may or may not have a web UI. I use it with Nextcloud tasks, which has a serviceable web UI.
If you download it from Fdroid, it doesn’t have a subscription. And it has all the features unlocked.
Unfortunately, it doesn’t look like that BBC experiment is going well. They’ve barely posted anything, relative to what they could post. They should set up their systems to auto-post to Mastodon when they post to Twitter or where ever else.
One feature that might help with this is something similar to multi-reddits, where users can categorize communities into their own “meta communities”.
Not necessarily. While of course in many many cases, open source is a volunteer effort, there’s usually some implicit transaction going on. Whether that’s improving the software for yourself and passing that on to others, being a business and improving a library or something you use that helps your project generate revenue, or even a straight up commercial transaction.
But in all these cases, the open source project can be taken by you (or others) and you can do whatever you want with it. In the case of Winamp here, you cannot do any of that. It would be different if they were paying for contributions. But they’re not, so.