Or just stop being poor. Or win the lottery. Or marry rich. Or just be successful.

Clearly OP hasn’t worked hard enough.

I’ll hold on to my opinion, you’ll hold on to yours. Just don’t think your opinion is fact, or even worse, universal.

One last thing: videos can be sped up.

Thanks, I fully agree with you.

The elitist attitude that “videos can’t teach you anything” or “information is worthless if consumed as a video” just bothers me. It’s just contra productive to the goal of disseminating knowledge and understanding to completely ignore or belittle one medium.

I know learning styles have been disproven, but you might find it worth your time to read the findings where they talk about how certain things are better taught or absorbed in a different manner. Mocking others for consuming things differently doesn’t make you look more educated.

Dude, people are still asking wtf functors, monoidd, monads, and other such things are and there are papers written about those things all the time. Why is it so hard to accept that not everybody can stay awake while reading a scientific article? Are you just unwilling to accept that videos are easier to consume?

Some people cannot understand what such scientific articles are saying because of how they were written and for which audience. Are you unaware that visual aids and animations exist? Do you think describing something is always better than showing it? There is a reason the expression “a picture can say more than a thousand words”.

Yes, there are some videos that are just somebody reading an article to you with no added content, but I feel like this argument is brought jp regardless of video. Providing a DOI:// link just makes me shake my head.

Once radicle becomes viable and federated source forges are finally in vogue, github can suck it and these kinds of things will belong to the past.

That sounds like me! But I’m not a good engineer, just good at hiding and doing the bare minimum. Somebody looking at my work would just say it’s average and that’s pretty much all I aim for. No need to stand out because it doesn’t get rewarded with money but more work - I hate more work.

Then what’s the reasoning behind “dev”?

Someone suggested queen and worker. Luffy and then branches named after crew members also seemed nice. Another suggested dom and sub. Leader and cultist were other suggestions. For any StarCraft mod it should be Kerrigan and Raynor, or OverMind and Zerg, or for the later stages Amon and Protoss.

I love all those suggestions. Keeps things interesting and conveys the same thing.

dev is confusing it implies it’s not the stable branch, no? Or was the master branch never stable for you?

Yaaaaaaaaa!

I need repos with these branch names. Main just sounds so lame. This would keep me on my toes

Triggered 🤣

Hopefully this will have the side effect of pushing companies to offer payment to maintain and develop projects they depend on.

That’s unfortunate, but I understand. Good luck and have fun!

Anti Commercial-AI license

Is Godot too big to contribute to?

Anti Commercial-AI license

How well AI can trade crypto and, if possible other things. Right now it’s just in the exploration phase to understand what’s necessary, which language to use, what hardware is necessary, previous art, and so on.

I’d like to put a part of my salary into green, European investments and haven’t found any ETFs that do so. There must be something out there but it’s being made hard to find and I’m not going to spend the little time I have investigating every single green european company to find out how to invest in them.

Anti Commercial-AI license

I’m for saying “fuck JavaScript” and moving on to something more sane. Even visual basic for the web would make sense. LUA for the web, or even Python, but fuck JavaScript.

I say let oracle have it. Let the language die.

Anti Commercial-AI license

Hopefully these won’t end up in the ukraine war on the side of Russia 😐

Anti Commercial-AI license

The US and the West at large just thought China would stay that nice exploitable country for cheap labor forever. Their plans never adjusted to either find an alternative or move back production.

Capitalists praise “the power of the market” for being agile and whatnot, but companies (and many Western countries are being run by companies) target costs optimisation at all costs. They are like AIs with a bias for it and hyper-specialise for it. The only moves companies have are “buy the competitor” and for countries it’s just protectionism until war.

This isn’t praise for China throwing the majority of their citizens into the machine as cheap labor for Western companies, more a critique of the West’s tunnel vision. We will reap what we sowed.

Anti Commercial-AI license