The subhead misses out the worst stuff. How on earth?
Criminal charges still in the works, I would hope.
The subhead misses out the worst stuff. How on earth?
Criminal charges still in the works, I would hope.
Comfortably-off customers casting aspersions on “minimum wage workers” are the absolute pits.
There is lots to say here but you are too clueless to say any of it. FFS
So, you think when bad laws go away, the attitudes behind them disappear as if by magic?
The article gives up-to-date statistics as well as the dates of various laws. If you think those statistics are wrong, or don’t demonstrate what the authors say they do, you can explain. Or admit that your opinion is rooted in abject ignorance of the world you live in. Either will do.
Bullshit.
You probably missed my edit. You didn’t give evidence for your position so I’ve asked you to refute evidence for mine, just to make it nice and simple for you.
The story is about Italy?
You didn’t give your evidence so perhaps you’d prefer to refute this? Patriarchy in disguise — the myth of gender equality in the Netherlands
So, you think you live in a society where discrimination based on sex does not exist.
Where is that, and what is your evidence for your claim?
So you do think there is a patriarchy? And you think it is based on fact, not the social construction of gender?
Something being a social construct does not mean it has no real world effects. That’s kind of the point of identifying it as a social construct. HTH
*and he’s not rich
Thank you! Surprised the report didn’t mention that (I was too lazy to do a search).