Please suggest how it can be more scary. I was thinking about adding compulsory steps/procedure/documentation for reproductible builds of binary/binaries alongside source code !?

License’s focus is not vibe coding devs but in general FOSS devs but current GPL licenses doesn’t protect them from A.I. scrapping their work. This one I wish will protect their works against non FOSS LLM/A.I. models leeching their work.

Being too restrictive is international. Also I think if organisation using internally it’s difficult to enforce this specific term but it will keep them away of they are not intentional about releasing source code.

Looking forward to comment.

True. Also hope that Arcane and other non Linux specific stuff gets more attention

Photo of robot : https://www.reddit.com/r/NetBSD/s/dbLwBbg5m1

We need more FOSSified hardwares in market

Author confirmed somewhere else that 1 euro option sold out apparantly now there’s 2 euro option.

https://www.nas.nasa.gov/hecc/support/kb/using-software-packages-in-pkgsrc_493.html

Will be better for offline phone backup 👍

Ada is good name for girl child

Fairphone

Fairphone