![](/static/66c60d9f/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://programming.dev/pictrs/image/170721ad-9010-470f-a4a4-ead95f51f13b.png)
// this line increments the value of i by 1
i++;
// this line increments the value of i by 1
i++;
That’s actually the perfect comment, because if anyone ever comes back to fuck with you about it, it’s explained right there. Then you turn it right back around on management and watch them run around like chickens with their heads cut off.
You mean autistic.
Can you actually name capture groups, or this means how you can refer to them by number?
I see the same thing with our newer folks. (And some older folks too.) and management seems to encourage it. Scary scary stuff. Because when something goes wrong there’s only a couple of people who can really figure it out. If I get hit by a bus or laid off, that’s going to be a big problem for them.
People who rely on this shit don’t know how to debug anything. They just copy some code, without fully understanding the library or the APIs or the semantics, and then they expect someone else to debug it for them.
This was happening before this “AI” craze.
It’s almost like working with shitty engineers.
I run perl on arch btw
And it says the hours are 9 to 5. Who the fuck cares then? If it takes you four hours to get from south east London to north west London, then there’s half of your day. Grab some crisps or some spotted dick and put some footie on your vodafone in the tube.
Doesn’t that mean private non-routable subnets like 10.x or 192.x have always been a hack?
Wait… Do we not like NAT now??
More useful at collecting your data.
Also his kid was kind of… I don’t know, special?
I’m trying to figure out who Riley’s kid was?
Yeah but how many k-folds before it shits itself?
.so please, I use arch btw.
Sometimes I think after i retire, I should teach. In the hopes that i could inspire people to write good code, instead of a lot of the garbage i see in the industry. This comment makes me sad.