Lol thanks for that, i stopped watching after minute 5.

Yes the point was that the problem is the system design not the voters not being logical enough go watch star trek and follow Spock’s character development. 😂

And the problem with using a shared cultural reference is? 😂

Fucker we use water pipes to explain current and other concepts in high energy physics.

You need to get over yourself.

And your problem remains the same. Your friend experiences the world differently than you. You gf might very well have had a symmetrical face in her mind.

And as for sound healing: define healing. ;) many people find emotional release through music. Which is an example of healing.

You basically just sound like an anal retentive ass afk who hasnt even started to comprehend the world and people around them.

they couldn’t reason their way out of a wet paper bag.

neither can you apparently. you’re confusing reasoning with jargon. they just speak a different dialect.

‘focus energy in your feet’ is tell you to ground yourself, loosen your knees and tighten the core. chi describes focusing your mental attention on something. any person who has snowboarded/skateboarded would understand exactly what that person is saying if they bothered to listen and put the terms into context.

do you consider ‘sound healing’ bogus? what if I told you your cells have receptors that can detect sound vibrations (your ears work right? but its more than that individual cells can too.)? which cause neural impulses which can impact large areas of the brain and body directly and indirectly.

your problem is you dont stop to listen and understand what these people are saying and you just dismiss it because they settled on using a different way of speaking and describing concepts that are nontraditional in western societies.

Incorrect, fptp voting systems suck.

You mean like running a campaign based on genocide, war hawking, and enabling corporate abuses as a democratic candidate? Yeah i was pretty baffled by that too.

Fun fact: a lot of the crystal healers i interact with are solid people.

Nutty sure but most of them are all about emotional wellness and support and very few are okay with trump or republicans.

It always amuses me when the people who think they’re rational and shit on the mystic groups miss out on wonderful friends and allies.

Kind of like the 2019 campaign when everone shit on Marianne Williamson.

oi, hitting the critical mass of enough users to be interesting, but thankfully not at enough users where it is profitable for them yet. sigh

we all know what you meant. you’re just incorrect, your conflating multiple different types of attacks and asserting the one that is easiest to resolve is an equivalent problem. shrug

1. if the developer of the application is writing malware, its malware end of story. its usually discovered rapidly and people avoid it.
2. supply chain attacks are harder to achieve (i.e. uploading a tainted binary to a software repository)
3. curling a shell script is pretty much the easiest target. you have a bunch of randomly setup servers serving a program that literally intended to install software on systems. You now have a large surface area random from typo attacks, to dns poisoning etc.

many devs i’ve encountered in the wild (FANG/startups/randomly) can barely sort a list without causing problems. so now we have people hosting multiple servers they probably didn’t configure correctly. meaning instead of a few centralized repositories we need to secure we now have to trust these individual people have enough technical know how to safely host such a setup.

thats the problem with these setups. its not the developer being a bad actor we’re worried about, its the systems they’ve setup to serve these scripts. with checksums and side channels its easy to validate the resulting binary. which can effectively nips any issues with a compromised repository.

1. no one is talking about NPM libraries. we’re talking about released packages.
2. you absolutely can ensure a binary hasnt been tampered with. its called checksumming.
3. you’re confusing MITM attacks with supply chain attacks. MITM attacks are far easier to pull off.

Not everything is provided with a package manager

Yes. thats precisely the problem we’re pointing out to you. if you’re going to provide software over the internet provide a proper package with checksum validation. its not hard, stop providing bash scripts.

How do you know the script hasnt been compromised? Is every user competent enough to evaluate it to ensure its safe to run?

Using package managers to handle this provides a couple things: First: most package manager have builtin mechanisms to ensure the binary is unmodified Second: they provide a third party validating them.

Lol if you think we send in Seal team 6 for hostages of foreign countries.

LLCs are plebs. You need a corporation to not be a pleb and it needs to be registered in Delaware.

na, they’ll just say it doesn’t apply to companies because no clear pleb to pin it on.