![](/static/66c60d9f/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/c0ed0a36-2496-4b4d-ac77-7d2fd7f2b5b7.png)
Yeah, very well may be. LSPs always slow down opening big files, so I usually inspect those with an empty/different config
Yeah, very well may be. LSPs always slow down opening big files, so I usually inspect those with an empty/different config
And how’s that different from js’s "1" + 2
? One can always convert a number to string, and only sometimes – a string to a number, so it’s pretty logical to go with the former.
4.2 megs on one line? Vim probably can handle it fine, although syntax won’t be highlighted past a certain point
Well, C has implicit casts, and it’s not that weird (although results in some interesting bugs in certain circumstances). Python is also funny from time to time, albeit due to different reasons (e.g. -5**2
is apparently -25 because of the order of operations)
That’s an impressive commit graph, tho
Regarding the title: as in just make?
May I interest you in https://tushar.lol/post/cursed-for/
I mean, changing a const
is itself a questionable move (the question being whether the one doing it is insane)
I thought of it more in terms of changing constants (by casting the const
away). AFAIK when it’s not volatile
, the compiler can place it into read-only data segment or make it a part of some other data, etc. So, technically, changing a const volatile
would be less of a UB compared to changing a regular const
(?)
Sry, the best I can do on mobile
deleted by creator
Go has the single easiest to Google name of any programming language.
Ackchually
Remember the dude who managed to trade a paperclip for a home with a few transactions in between? Basically that depending on the exact monetary value of said bottom-barelness :)
You can certainty do this, yet it’s not time- (and hence cost-) efficient.
By having no plugin support or something?
makes me wander, what ai/prompt did you use to generate the pic. Looks neat!
Well, the link doesn’t load for me, so if that’s smth related to python and not a justification of the behavior from math’s pov, I know that’s expected. Hence,
But just as well is “1” + 2.