One is online.

Sure mate.

You’re suggesting that showing videos in a town square is the same as posting in Twitter? They’re not the same, obviously.

It’s complex and I don’t have the answers. My comment is merely hilighting the conflict between these 2 ideals… governments shouldn’t whether or not specific content is ok, but companies shouldn’t provide content which is clearly unacceptable.

If xitter didn’t provide that content the government wouldn’t have to intervene.

If the government does intervene it reduces the barrier for them to intervene in future.

I’m quite conflicted about this.

I hate musk. Hate twitter. Hate that people were sharing videos of a terrorist attack.

That said, I suspect that this was something of a test case, with the regulator flexing their censorship muscle, and I’m glad it didn’t work out.

It’s also disappointing that her kids were doxxed, I don’t condone that at all… but “just doing my job” is not a reasonable defence when you have a shitty job strategising how to corrode privacy.

Similar here. I’m an accountant by trade but tech is my strongest hobby.

It’s not really about reaching a wide audience, but about actually supporting the people I care about.

I don’t think even my elderly parents watch “news” anymore, and their main threat is vanilla type phishing emails.

I don’t think I’m really making any of those points in isolation, but I think probably the first.

It’s possible to acknowledge that I don’t agree with the views of the devs while using their software, but it does create a kind of tension that I would avoid if a viable alternative existed.

The views of devs are relevant to my decision whether or not to use whatever software, but they’re not solely determinant.

Similarly, I prefer open source software and will always seek it out and when comparing alternatives I heavily weight open source as an advantage. That said, I do still use some microsoft software (notably microsoft teams) for a variety of reasons.

I’m strongly opposed to the lemmy devs political and social views, yet I’m happily using the platform they developed.

I’m not quite sure how I can be clearer?

I don’t think hate is the right word. Vitriol maybe.

I don’t hate the project or the devs.

It’s just that when someone suggests this might one day be a competitive browser engine, everyone feels obligated to point out, sometimes a little too emphatically, the many challenges the project must overcome.

Perhaps part of it is borne of frustrations around mozilla. They’re our last best chance, and yet we’re all very frustrated at their constant mismanagement and errors of judgement. The suggestion that several people can build an independent competitor in their spare time is… unbearable.

With all that said, if they ever achieve anything approaching Firefox’s compatibility and reliability, I will be their most ardent supporter. Until then I’ll be here in these threads calling idiots naive.

My idiology diverges significantly from the lemmy devs, but here we are.

Because people can discuss whatever they like?

If you don’t like it just down vote it.

My set up is similar to this but I’m using wildcards.

So all my containers are on 10.0.0.0/8, and public dns server resolves *.sub.domain.com to 10.0.0.2, which is a reverse proxy for the containers.

No one is saying it is their job.

Merely that using a TLD like .internal requires some consideration regarding ssl certificates.