oh shit this takes me back

“he said he was ire-ish, and our scholars still don’t know what that that means, but we assume it’s that if you draw his ire, he will be angry.”

perfect for those cold winter nights!

personally, i know it would have made me feel quite cross about the whole situation.

because cisco fears change and doesnt innovate technologies so much as acquire other companies’ tech and frankenstein it into their portfolio.

i feel you bro. people in here talking shit like they don’t know that some net devices are literally made for webgui first and foremost, and programmatic changes don’t work for every api even if it says it’s supported (fucking looking at brocade).

if you’re used to cisco cli, shit like juniper or palo alto or f5 can be intimidating when looking at the configs.

but i swear to fucking god if you use gui instead of cli for cisco, we gon have words.

a couple minutes of photoshop and a smudge or burn tool would also negate all the effects

hahaha, the solar panels aren’t aligned to the windows

so typically in CSS, you work with columns of sorts, and then you have a bit of a gutter zone on either edge. edit: forgot to mention, the gutter columns are there to provide a bit of a whitespace buffer on the left and right side of the page so the eyes are drawn toward the center portion of the webpage.

this looks like those cases where the developer makes something aligned to the absolute edge of the webpage rather than aligned to the edge of the column it’s supposed to be in. so you get a bunch of stuff looking nice and neat (the windows are symmetrical for the area of the house they are in, and the solar panels are placed above said windows).

the problem is that one of the sets of solar panels looks like it had the spirit of being aligned to the window, but is instead off to the right of it.

as someone who has a touch of the sperg, i theorize that CSS developers do this as a national sport akin to professional chicken, and they do it to see how much they can fuck with a perfectly aligned page and still get away with it because people don’t realize it’s on purpose. but that could also be because i’m bitter lol

i wish they’d just fucking nut up and be up front about it. then you can at least see it in plain view as can everyone else.

“we’re putting down dissent, regardless of if it kills our site usage or valuation. get on board or fuck off.” is the exact same thing that’s occurring, but is at least slightly more respectable than this microsoft-esque “we’re doing this for your own good (whether you like it or not)” approach.