• 0 Posts
  • 137 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 5th, 2023

help-circle













  • Looking back, I find every single aspect of the 2018 design more accessible than the current one. Releases are above the fold, the list of forks is reachable by clicking the number next to the fork button, the explore link is right there in the top navigation. Sure, having three levels of horizontal navigation doesn’t look very clean but there must be a better solution than hiding everything in hamburger menus and sidebars where you can only find them if you already know they exist.


  • dfyx@lemmy.helios42.detoProgrammer Humor@programming.devPR: Linux.exe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    If I remember correctly, they used to be in a tab in the top navigation, together with “Code”, “Issues”, “Pull requests”, etc. which was a lot easier to find for people who are not familiar with GitHub’s UI. Edit: it was a separate bar right above the file list, together with the number of commits and branches: https://web.archive.org/web/20180610234228/https://github.com/rails/rails

    Same problem with forks / network. In earlier revisions of GitHub’s UI, they were relatively easy to find. Now you have to know that you can click the “59.7k forks” sidebar text which is in no way styled like a link or button. You can just infer it from the fact that there are also “Readme” and “View license” in the same list.



  • Definitely not C#. Wrong syntax for main, wrong syntax for foreach (C# has foreach (var i in someCollection) and what even is this method call syntax with =?

    Edit: I dug around the website. It’s D. I’m still confused about the method call syntax though. Usually, D uses parentheses like most other C-style languages. Must be some weird syntax where you can call methods like property setters which was useful for this particular code golf challenge.



  • My question was specifically about “the general non-technical population”. Do you expect my mom to even remotely understand what different servers are and why talking to me is securely encrypted but talking to her friends group isn’t? The point about secure software is that it needs to be secure by default or else, entry level users will manage to accidentally send their stuff in plain text and not even notice.

    For nerds like us, I agree that Matrix is probably a good choice. For someone who needed to be told that “the internet” isn’t the blue “e” on their desktop… not so much. I’d rather send carrier pigeons than explain Matrix to my family.