![](/static/66c60d9f/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://programming.dev/pictrs/image/170721ad-9010-470f-a4a4-ead95f51f13b.png)
Ahh, then the modification must be done on the AST level not the in-memory representation since anyway you do it, you must retain the original.
Ahh, then the modification must be done on the AST level not the in-memory representation since anyway you do it, you must retain the original.
Hmm, maybe I am missing the point. What exactly do you mean by handling automatic updates in place? Like, the program that requires and parses the config file is watching for changes to the config file?
Until someone cannot tell the difference between tab and space when configuring or you miss one indentation. Seriously, whoever thinks indentation should have semantic meaning for computers should burn in hell. Indentation is for us, humans, not computers. You can write a JSON with or without indentation if you want. Also, use JSON5 to have comments and other good stuff for a config file.
Yep. Much like we don’t treat phone numbers like a number. The rule of thumb is that if you don’t do any arithmetic with it, it is not a “number” but numeric.
Yeah, nevermind, I didn’t know what I wrote either. I need my sleep lol.
Depends on the application. When the user is able to set the schema via database, then you cannot assume the shape of the data.
I prefer CUID
Just to clarify: Yes, I do know not all use cases are appropriate for CUID. But in general when generating ID, I’d use CUID2
For NAT, there is apparently a way to traverse NAT. I haven’t tried it tho, but the dude has a lot of research on the topic (NAT traversal), so if that didn’t work, maybe others will
It is worse in HW prototyping where sometimes loose wire is all over the place
But the recommendation can make better inference if they have more data wouldn’t they? What should have happened is opt-in for a better recommendation.
To be honest, that is one rad use cases. Games usually don’t have privacy concern as much as day to day usage. The problem is the fucking recall works by denylist instead of allowlist
Instagram by Meta has started using user generated content for their training data. Naturally users are upset about this and are flocking to a new platform named Cara made by an artist which has principle and are actively fighting for artist copyright. Cara uses Vercel to host their platform. The problem is that the sudden influx of users means bigger bills to pay to handle those traffic (I think they are billed around ~$96k). As of now, it is unclear how they will proceed to pay the bills. The creator of Cara didn’t want to compromise his stance by accepting any money willy-nilly, but also acknowledged that angel investors are not easy to find.
Most probably, yes
What the fuck are you talking about? Do you think the license being used is not legally binding? What constitutes as legally binding to you?
“What if the test fail?”
*Write a test for the test
deleted by creator
Make CScript, an interpreted, duck-typed language