Thank you, that’s ~~probably ~~ what I needed to hear 🙈

but a strict dmarc can prevent it right… paranoid now 😅

cant dmarc prevent this? 😳

imo they offer unfinished or straight up redundant products. with the “community feedback” you get a certain amount of “points” which you can use to beg them to implement features (which other apps implemented years ago) only for them to basically never implement anything, even if hundreds of users describe it as “critical”.

it took me a week to convince my family of a familyplan, but then less than 1 hour of trying the android apps to decide against it.

id advise to just start using joplin or whatever suits you. i cannot prove it but would not be surprised if they keep buying those apps mainly to remove them from the market and thus grow their monopoly ecosystem. addy.io also got an offer to sell but refused.

lol what a joke , im genuinly surpised anyone would even pay for 1 of their producs [besides the vpn maybe]

basically.

even minimal metadata for example from signal contains

Message dates and times

Message senders and recipients (via phone number identifiers)

From these 2 pieces of information, its possible to build social graphs: who talked to who, and when they did it. Also, who’s in a group chat with who else.

https://github.com/dessalines/essays/blob/master/why_not_signal.md#why-not-signal

(worth to read in full)

Thanks, appreciate it. And just to be clear, i found this article on the internet and thought its interesting to share with a community who claims to care about privacy; it was not meant to be a slander attack or anything, and I remain like 80% sure that youre not CIA 😜

Thanks for your feedback, I tried to clarify it a bit, the post title, however, cannot be changed because of rule 7.

😒 if people comment, why do they not read the post or the linked article?

and sorry but how is this not false advertising? https://proton.me/blog/switzerland

geeat website, thanks!

read the article, the keypoints have nothing to do with proton or the posted article. i just tried to add more context and illustrste that “swiss privacy” is an empty marketing phrase, like “military grade security” etc.

can you also give a response to the “Addendum 2” in the article?

sure, but also

„We kill people based on metadata.“ Michael Hayden, NSA

my inability to answer that question makes me consider to apply for a job in the swiss secret service.

i mentionied the flaws i saw and are are being adresssed by the community since years without ever anything happening. so i just dont get the focus on a problem that does not even exist.

what will the next article be about? to dont write your password on a post it and stick it onto the screen?

no they are not, just another stupid article from proton. nothing stops you from saying that bwE0F^{pHb5iPzMZiismyeiTIWh}oB*#V8SaD0F3R*SeH was your first pets name.

proton however stops you from disabling otp after setting up multiple security keys, they stop you from putting a pin on your drive app and they stop you from using an +4 digit pin on your mail app.

but yea, the potentially insecure thing they dont even offer is the biggest concernn here 🤦‍♀️

deleted by creator

kagi is so overrated, I don’t get it. it’s not even worth to set up email aliases and abuse their unlimited trials. searx is much better, if you really want to pay for something and need Ai stuff i recommended perplexity and nothing else.