![](/static/66c60d9f/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://programming.dev/pictrs/image/170721ad-9010-470f-a4a4-ead95f51f13b.png)
if you continue to try { thisBullshit(); } you are going to catch (theseHands)
This is the most beautiful thing I’ve read all year
if you continue to try { thisBullshit(); } you are going to catch (theseHands)
This is the most beautiful thing I’ve read all year
Yup, I was only pointing out that i was having trouble doing the same thing in my docker compose (using the webui_port env variable did not avoid port collisions at deployment)
I haven’t tried this particular compose outline though. It could also be the pirate_network they’re initiating or the depends_on variables they’re using, I just haven’t played around with it yet.
Question: how are you deploying your arr apps? do you do that in a separate compose file?
AFAIK the thing that complicates this is trying to run it behind gluetun
docker makes it really easy to specify a unique port on deployment, but when you’re using a network bridge (as in the case of gluetun) the networking settings are controlled there instead, so you can’t use the normal port declarations. It’s apparently not impossible to do it with gluetun but it seems it’s not as straightforward.
lmao. I’m starting to really wonder what the WEBGUI_PORT variable does if not exactly what you’re changing in the GUI… someone else mentioned they got multiple instances to deploy from the same compose file by placing the gluetun service at the end of the file. I wonder if the order in which the containers are deployed is the thing that makes this work. i’ll test more when I have the time
I might need to try this… I wonder if it makes a difference that the gluetun service is listed last. I noticed that trying to start the containers in the wrong order results in port collision errors, maybe this is why it works for you?
This worked!!
Shame that it’s a little bit of a runaround, but not only did this work, it also persists after restarts and updates.
I’ll be editing my post and offering it as a solution to the other places I have seen this question asked, thank you a ton!
I’m looking at hotio now.
their documentation isn’t as comprehensive as linuxserver.io, i’ll probably have to just try it out and see if it works. looks like they also have one that has wireguard bundled but it’s really unclear how that works
Can I ask what your compose file looks like? Or how you deployed?
yea, i just tried a couple things to no avail:
publish a new port in gluetun, e.g.
- 8082:8082
then set webui port in the new instance:
- environment:
- WEBUI_PORT: 8082
error on deployment
Then I tried spinning up the new container separately, declaring the pots eg:
- ports:
- 8082:8082
and then manually switching the network to gluetun and turning off the port declaration, and it still ends up on the default port. Bummer.
nah, it seems like it’s a known problem, no worries. There’s an unresolved issue open on the gluetun github about it. I just figured someone would have had a workaround at this point since I see people recommend separate client instances to keep things organized all the time.
I think the people who do that just don’t use a VPN, but I have strong feelings against exposing my IP
edit: that’s interesting. I’ve tried a few variations, but maybe I didn’t try that one
Also, the point of HA is usually to avoid 3rd party servers, so you don’t just need something that runs HA, you need something that can receive data signals that may not be over wifi. Unless you can connect 3rd party receiver dongles to your phone, it’ll end up limiting which devices you can use on your network.
As far as I know, the service fees only apply to apps that charge for their app or have in-app purchases. sorry, I misunderstood what you meant
I assume that difference has more to do with the value of ads being higher on a smartphone given the abundance of data that isn’t available via browser.
They can still serve you ads, they simply cannot help themselves to your data.
The thing that jumps out to me here is that mobile data is apparently worth 20% more than web data and that in no way surprises me but very much pisses me off
🤷
I don’t mean ban evasion, I mean posting about it on another instance
It just looks a lot like posting about a break up. Usually you get only half the story and the other person is made out to be crazy
I have no opinion about the particular circumstances of ops ban or anyone else’s interaction with lemmy.ml, but posting through a ban just never looks good
A whole comment section posting bans looks… worse. It looks worse.
Fair point, Margot Robbie
Yup, I ended up frankensteining a nas from various craigslist parts (i actually found a low-power business-class server motherboard that has worked out well for the purpose). Had to get a SAS HBA card and a couple SFF-8087 cables to do the job right, and I grabbed an old gaming case from the 2010’s to hold it all, but it was relatively seamless. I had one of the drives go out already, but luckily I had it in a raid configuration with parity so it was just a matter of swapping out the drives and rebuilding.
It’s been fun and rewarding, for sure! I’m glad I didn’t sell them like these other dweebs told me to lol