I decided to Google that name to understand. First blog I clicked on has a paragraph that starts:
I think it’s especially absurd to place your trust in Mozilla FurryFox and their team of stereotypical SJWs and soydevs …
In 2020 this person was substituting coherent points with trite schoolyard namecalling from over a decade before. So that dude’s not only an incoherent idiot but also dangerous. Man.
For real, what idea was that actually meant to convey? OP seems confused about having been indoctrinated with cult language
(OP I’ve been there, good on you for reflecting on it, but there’s more unpacking to do)
Hoo-wee you’re gonna be extra disappointed about that particular demographic then
Boy are you gonna be disappointed to learn who’s on the internet then
That’s wonderful for you, but it does happen.
“skimming things like programming blogs and stackoverflow”
Like this commenter claims he doesn’t do?
Sometimes there are better methods to implement something, and we can learn from others’ mistakes without having to make them ourselves
Nametag that says “GitHub CoPilot” and if anyone asks you to “help them with their code” answer like you’re Clippy from MS Word
If their spam filter is “learning,” and if new signup verification emails are a consistent decades-old practice, how much longer should we wait before it’s okay to question whether Google’s filter could do better at learning?