It certainly sounds like you have a strong preference how to split preferences into two groups. ;)
It certainly sounds like you have a strong preference how to split preferences into two groups. ;)
Isn’t every rule just a preference of someone influential enough to make it into a rule?
Well, that’s certainly a color scheme.
Judging by what OP was searching for, they’re probably aware. And the scammers are too.
GDPR doesn’t require them to ask if they would just not violate our privacy. In other words, it’s perfectly legal to assume “no” if they have no means of asking.
Well, more power to them then! Ernest can then merge back the changes at his own pace, so everybody wins. Forks don’t need to be treated with hostility.
The answer is “currently no”, and that might change. Just like with jaywalking.
Originally jaywalking also wasn’t a ticketable offense. Do you know the origin of this term? That’s the parent poster’s point.
deleted by creator
Ah yes, let me sideload a 3rd party web browser onto my PC.
“Yes” in this case is agreeing with the cause of this list.
I mean, what do you expect from Fedipact? The dev doesn’t push anything onto you, you willingly visit a list that got created for the very purpose of going against Threads. There is no hidden agenda.
I’m pretty sure the same operation without Git (or another VCS) would be infinitely more troublesome, not less.
I can’t wait for some pope to tell the Africans it’s wrong to use these. Again.
Placating them doesn’t look like a great solution to me.
deleted by creator
Nothing as complex as that. Merely not willing to dox myself and limiting the details about my exact location. :)
European here: looks perfectly normal to me.
So it’s really a slippery slope of customer rights!
If he’s being a putin stooge because it’s good for his business, he’s still being a putin stooge.