As you can see, they never will. You must seize the wig.

I’m hoping even a junior dev has had more than 60 hours of training.

The most important line on that page:

“FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.”

deleted by creator

Considering last year was six days ago…I agree.

Yes, but at least they aren’t getting any useful data out of it. Jokes on them…

This is why I’ve created a life so tedious and boring that there’s no advantage to spying on me.

Man, now I’ll never find out how many times Samuel L Jackson can be called the n-word on the bridge of the Enterprise…

I’d say more than that. I don’t think anyone is that close to AGI…yet

A calculator does most of it too, but this is a LLM that can do lots of other things also, which is a big piece of the “general” part of AGI.

Richard Feynman said “You have to keep a dozen of your favorite problems constantly present in your mind, although by and large they will lay in a dormant state. Every time you hear or read a new trick or a new result, test it against each of your twelve problems to see whether it helps. Every once in a while there will be a hit, and people will say, “How did he do it? He must be a genius!”

We are close to a point where a computer that can hold all the problems in its “head” can test all of them against all of the tricks. I don’t know what math problems that starts to solve but I bet a few of them would be applicable to cryptology.

But then again, I have no idea what I’m talking about and just making bold guesses based on close to no information.

Of course there is zero way each of them will find that many people, let alone the levels below that. It’s a scam that benefits those higher up, and the ones lower will likely not receive anything.

And part of the scam is to tell people that there’s still time to be one of the early higher ups scamming other people!

All of their creativity goes into the mental gymnastics instead of something good or useful.

If ‘anybody’ does anything similar to tracing, copy&pasting or even sampling a fraction of another person’s imagery or written work, that anybody is violating copyright.

Ok, but tracing is literally a part of the human learning process. If you trace a work and sell it as your own that’s bad. If you trace a work to learn about the style and let that influence your future works that is what every artist already does.

The artistic process isn’t copyrighted, only the final result. The exact same standards can apply to AI generated work as already do to anything human generated.

I take it we don’t use the phrase “good writers borrow, great writers steal” in this day and age…

‘The acquisition of wealth is no longer the driving force in our lives. We work to better ourselves and the rest of humanity.’

• Professor Charles Xavier

It’s a speed suit.

It just occurred to me that AI in the nearish future will probably/almost certainly be able to do this.

You should look for an archive (dot) today that can get you around those paywalls.

Is this much different that the piles of prewritten obituaries news outlets have for pretty much every person they would report dying?

The man’s been through a lot. Let him have his hobbies.