Thank you for the proper explanation! They should copy this comment and put it somewhere on their website.

Okay but like, what does it do? That’s what I’m not understanding. Are you able and willing to explain it at all?

I don’t understand the appeal. But maybe that’s because 99% of my games are through steam where this is kind of already a basic feature?

Am I misunderstanding the use case here? Someone explain what is exciting about this, because the post and the link for people who haven’t heard of it didn’t really manage to explain how or why this is cool or useful in any meaningful detail.

Valheim was a better game in it’s first version than a lot of the games that are “complete” on this list.

I get where you’re coming from, and certainly some games don’t deserve to even be sold in their “early access” state. However, I think saying none of them should count at all is a bit ridiculous.

Valheim offered hundreds of hours worth of entertainment even in the early versions and has only improved since then. It only takes up 1gb of data through some miracle, and runs fairly well even on the steam deck.

Honestly it puts many of the other titles on the list to shame. Ignoring it because the dev wants to continue providing MORE free updates instead of calling the game finished and then charging for “DLC” is not a reason to punish the studio, if anything they should be looked to as an example of what other devs should do.

Honestly, there were a TON of games I was surprised to find on this list, but Valheim was not one of them.

Multiplayer games are especially vulnerable to the subjectiveness of enjoyment because not everybody has the same set of friends or experiences with their friends in the game, assuming they played with friends at all.

That said, I’ve been playing games for decades and I would put forth that even single player Valheim with no access to multiplayer would deserve to be much higher than the 100 placement on this terrible list.

I didn’t say any of these games were shit. I said that many of them were shit IN COMPARISON to Valheim, which is objectively true.

This list is offensive to say the least. Valheim at 100 and then goes on to show like 60ish games that are shit in comparison to that masterpiece.

Thank you for the explanation!

Is this a question, a suggestion, or some kind of stroke? Do you need medical attention?

You are paying hundreds of dollars to avoid minor driver issues that most people don’t even face. That’s your choice, but I can’t say that I see the sense in it.

You make it sound like any of that is difficult or extremely time consuming, which it isn’t. The payout far exceeds the price for entry.

I like to play my games on hardware that I picked out and put together personally. Also I like that hardware to be using an OS of my choosing with as much expandable storage as I could possibly want. Also, I don’t like to give my money to companies that encourage exclusivity on their hardware.

Just buy a gaming PC.

Wow, just use some quotes instead of causing strokes with this use of capitalization.

ACAB

Yeah I’m about to the spot where I normally get stuck right now. So I probably won’t make much progress in that amount of time anyway. I guess we’ll see!

I picked Satisfactory back up because I keep getting part way in and losing focus. Just unlocked tiers 5 and 6! In the process of setting up hypertubes to my major locations.