Honestly, if someone were to try to safe my life. And I find out he uses a string as a parameter to do so. Just let me die right there.
I am not so much disappointed as I am blinded with rage.
Honestly, if someone were to try to safe my life. And I find out he uses a string as a parameter to do so. Just let me die right there.
I don’t care, you’re not to use static!
I’m the Tony Stark.
Is it fair that I have to post a source when someone criticizing doesn’t?
If you’re trying to debunk a myth or call someone’s BS, then yes a source should be your opening statement. Is it fair? No. Is it necessary? Absolutely.
With all that said thank you for providing the source. A very well written one it was. I am going to debunk this myth now too, if and when I see it.
Context and source?
Surely this will go somewhere. /s
I respectively disagree there. If a writer didn’t give any concent whatsoever to give an A.I. a copy of their written works for an A.I. to train or base anything on. I think it’s a fair case of theft. Theoretically, someone would be able ask an A.I. to recite an entire book for them. Without ever having to pay its author any contribution.
“This says the bibble…”
Can I get a ‘Literally 1984’ in here?
We should call it: “Algorithmic Intelligence” or A.I. for short.
What does this mean?
And just like programming: I’m going to copy this line and pretend it’s mine!
If Shakespeare did say that back then, it would actually sound very poetic. (at least if you omid SSL)
Maybe like a one million dollar fine? That’s a lot of money, you know.