FaceDeer

Also Library Genesis.

The IA is appealing the decision so they’re not out of the woods just yet.

But when you die and an AI company contacts all your grieving friends and family to offer them access to an AI based on you (for a low, low fee!)

You can stop right there, you’re just imagining a scenario that suits your prejudices. Of all the applications for AI that I can imagine that would be better served by a model that is entirely under my control this would be the top of the list.

With that out of the way the rest of your rhetorical questions are moot.

Even with that, being absolutist about this sort of thing is wrong. People undergoing surgery have spent time on heart/lung machines that breathe for them. People sometimes fast for good reasons, or get IV fluids or nutrients provided to them. You don’t see protestors outside of hospitals decrying how humans aren’t meant to be kept alive with such things, though, at least not in most cases (as always there are exceptions, the Terri Schiavo case for example).

If I want to create an AI substitute for myself it is not anyone’s right to tell me I can’t because they don’t think I was meant to do that.

I don’t believe humans are “meant” to do anything. We are a result of evolution, not intentional design. So I believe humans should do whatever they personally want to do in a situation like this.

If you have a loved one who does this and you don’t feel comfortable interacting with their AI version, then don’t interact with their AI version. That’s on you. But don’t belittle them for having preferences different from your own. Different people want different things and deal with death in different ways.

If you don’t want to do it then don’t do it. Can we stop trying to tell everyone else they have to have the same values as you?

This sort of thing always reminds me of the classic Louis CK bit from Conan O’Brien: Everything is amazing and nobody is happy.

If their goal is to prevent AI trainers from scraping their art then an open federated platform is the opposite of what they want.

It also has an expensive back end and no plans for any kind of monetization, so it’s dead in the water from that side too. The moment they’re successful they’re broke.

I’ve mainly been using open-weight models I can run locally to back them, so it’ll last as long as personal computers do.

But I really do find them useful, so they are getting it right in at least some cases.

I actually want AI enhancements to many of the programs I use. I find them useful.

Now watch as I get tossed out the window.

If they feel less need to add proper alt-text because peoples’ browsers are doing a better job anyway, I don’t see why that’s a problem. The end result is better alt text.

I would expect it’d be not too hard to expand the context fed into the AI from just the pixels to including adjacent text as well. Multimodal AIs can accept both kinds of input. Might as well start with the basics though.

I’d be okay with picking up SGU where it left off, using the cryosleep break as an opportunity to recast and retool as needed. I think the show’s first season was weak but it was really picking up and getting interesting in the second season. I can think of a bunch of interesting directions things could go from there.

Of course, everything is predicated on “is the writing good?” If you have good writing you can make something awesome out of almost any premise. And if it’s bad event the best premise won’t save you. It’s even worse when it’s bad writing on a good premise because it “ruins” it for future attempts.

I’m very divided. Ask me a couple of years ago and I’d be all over that. But since then every single one of the great old sci-fi franchises I loved have been methodically ruined by “remakes” and “sequels” and “retellings” and whatnot. So while I wouldn’t say no, I would be extremely trepidatious. I’d be bracing myself to reject it if it turns out to be stupid.

Same here. I’m waiting to see that lawsuit reach its final conclusion, I don’t want to throw good money after bad.

Even afterward, I’m concerned that they might go do some stupid stunt like that again. I’ll want to see if there’s any fallout among their leadership over getting into this situation.

No idea, I’m just repeating caveats I’ve seen raised on this particular news before.

The Fediverse doesn’t have any defenses against AI impersonators though, aside from irrelevance. If it gets big the same incentives will come into play.

Important to note that the initial form of this treatment is to trigger the growth of teeth that failed to grow in the first place, at least last I read about it. An important first step, but for now it may be dependent on there being an existing “tooth bud” down in the jaw to get going.

I suspect that in the long run we’ll need to figure out how to implant a new tooth bud, probably made using the patient’s stem cells, to grow replacements for teeth that have been lost later in life.