I probably would be too, in your situation.

❤️

Oh my goodness that sucks

I didn’t mean to come off as dismissive regarding your situation, simply to say that this isn’t a new phenomenon on the Internet.

I apologize for any offense caused

I’m very sorry to hear about your health problems, and I only wish you the best.

❤️

Best wishes to you!

This month…

I was gonna say… disgruntled people on the internet have been around probably since before OP was born… the grievances and bitching unleashed on Usenet and IRC back in the day could be legendary. ESP on IRC, where users and entire servers would go to war with each other.

The Internet is pretty incredible now, but it used to be a hell of a lot more fun

Hope you’re doing well! Best wishes!

American healthcare sucks unless you’re rich

Well said. I have nothing to add to that.

I think this may be less about Agile and more that you have a great management team that sets clear priorities and goals. Not every Agile environment is like that.

Shoutout to [email protected] 🖖🏻

could it be, because, according to this post of yours, you’re a kiddie-fucker?

Here is more credit source

according to who? you, a kiddie fucker?

lmao psychology today is a casual-reading magazine for civilians, not a professional resource, like a psychology dictionary from a professional organization.

just more

Cherry-picking

Cherry picking, suppressing evidence, or the fallacy of incomplete evidence is the act of pointing to individual cases or data that seem to confirm a particular position while ignoring a significant portion of related and similar cases or data that may contradict that position. Cherry picking may be committed intentionally or unintentionally.[2]

stop fucking kids, kiddie fucker

for, like, the fifth time…

first, i don’t believe you’re interested in that, or you wouldn’t be here trying to convince everyone it’s ok to fuck kids. but, also:

Straw man

A straw man fallacy (sometimes written as strawman) is the informal fallacy of refuting an argument different from the one actually under discussion, while not recognizing or acknowledging the distinction.[1] One who engages in this fallacy is said to be “attacking a straw man”.

ephebophelia cannot exist between two adults since

the definition doesn’t change just because you don’t want to be one

stop fucking kids, kiddie-fucker

The definition that you give is wrong you idiot.

just because you don’t like it doesn’t make it wrong. if you have a more credible source than the American Psychological Association, i’d like to see it. so far, you’ve just cherry-picked some rando definition that doesn’t make you look like the kiddie fucker you are,.

In the OP I clearly say that ephebophilia between two consenting adults is not morally wrong.

this argument is flawed because

ephebophelia cannot exist between two adults since

So do you think a 26 year old man being sexually attracted to a 18 or 19 your woman is not a ephebophile?

first, i don’t believe you’re interested in that, or you wouldn’t be here trying to convince everyone it’s ok to fuck kids. but, also:

Straw man

A straw man fallacy (sometimes written as strawman) is the informal fallacy of refuting an argument different from the one actually under discussion, while not recognizing or acknowledging the distinction.[1] One who engages in this fallacy is said to be “attacking a straw man”.

I said ephebophilia between two consenting adults

but your post title is

Ephebophiles are not immoral

ephebophelia cannot exist between adults because

Straw man

A straw man fallacy (sometimes written as strawman) is the informal fallacy of refuting an argument different from the one actually under discussion, while not recognizing or acknowledging the distinction.[1] One who engages in this fallacy is said to be “attacking a straw man”.

Cherry picking

Cherry picking, suppressing evidence, or the fallacy of incomplete evidence is the act of pointing to individual cases or data that seem to confirm a particular position while ignoring a significant portion of related and similar cases or data that may contradict that position. Cherry picking may be committed intentionally or unintentionally.

just because you found some definition from google that says you’re not a kiddie fucker doesn’t mean you’re not a kiddie fucker. The APA is a far more credible source than some random wiki-- you just lash out because you don’t want to admit you’re a kiddie fucker and that fucking kids is disgusting and wrong.

STOP FUCKING KIDS, KIDDIE FUCKER!

I believe it’s morally wrong for adults to have sex with minors.

no you don’t

Ephebophiles are not immoral

yet…

only regarding the specific rage of ages of the kids you want to fuck: adolescent vs preadolescent children.