Competitive harm in a fucking antitrust proceeding, lol, lmao even
Look, I’m a trial judge. I am not anyone that understands the industry and the markets in the way that you do. And so I take seriously when companies are telling me that if I find against Alphabet, it’s going to cause competitive harm.
Janeway is a blood-crazed necromancer who obviously lept at the opportunity to kill someone to bring two people back
Good thing they had an organ printer otherwise she’d be chopping people up for their kidneys
It’s partly a joke (your favourite peeve, for example) and probably a reference to the other, now archaic, meaning of pet:
fit of peevishness, offense or ill-humor at feeling slighted
I think you can accept idioms as they are or you’ll be endlessly feeling like one saying or another has got your goat
Legal principles preventing sex are simple and effective. If you erode those, you have not a lot protecting you from shit like having sex with children. Nothing stupid about that, just how it works.
You and your libertarian brain
So effective his own officers tried to blow him up
I fundamentally disagree that the latest batch of statistics/machine learning/~ AI ~ models deliver human-like performance.
I’m reminded of this episode of Citations Needed - https://citationsneeded.medium.com/episode-183-the-ai-hype-train-and-the-war-on-creative-labor-7e2efcd2b8d4
If it wasn’t, no one would ever develop any kind of software or scientific research
The overwhelming majority of software developers and researchers are paid a salary and don’t get own the IP of their inventions.
https://gist.github.com/timvisee/fcda9bbdff88d45cc9061606b4b923ca