IP in general is a very difficult idea to support. In theory, it’s supposed to reward innovation, but in practice it results in stagnation and price gouging.

Still no genocide.

deleted by creator

What team do you think I’m on?

deleted by creator

It does not. It puts individuals over the bourgeoisie.

It doesn’t, I’ve read it.

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

The context is that you grouped Communists with Nazis and Islamist extremists, and are arguing that all of their equally terrible views should be silenced. One of these things is far and away not like the others, and you know it.

Radicalization isn’t a bad thing. For example, the only logical solution to Climate Change is radical changes in societal structure, else we make the impending damages even worse.

“One for Communists is hardly any different as far as I’m concerned.”

Bruh.

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

What part of Communism is incompatible with Liberal Democracy?

Why is Liberal Democracy the only acceptable form of Democracy?

You did, that’s why you got banned. Equating an ideology centered around improving everyone’s lives with an ideology centered around ethnic dominance and genocide is Nazi apologia, implying Nazis had people’s best interests at heart rather than pure malice.

That is not the distinction between Socialism and Communism. Communism can be achieved via reform (theoretically), and Socialism can be achieved revolutionarily.

Socialism is Worker Ownership of the Means of Production.

Communism is a post-Socialist “Stateless, Classless, Moneyless society” achieved via abolition of Private Property.

Communism does not remove incentives for people to be able to improve their standard of living by working harder, this is just a false statement due to a lack of understanding.

Hope that clears things up!

Where?

Radical, yes. Extremist, no.