cm0002@piefed.world to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 1 year agoWebplemmy.mlimagemessage-square232linkfedilinkarrow-up1768arrow-down1162
arrow-up1606arrow-down1imageWebplemmy.mlcm0002@piefed.world to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square232linkfedilink
minus-square𝕨𝕒𝕤𝕒𝕓𝕚@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up65arrow-down2·1 year agoQuality loss? Webp supports lossless.
minus-squarepalordrolap@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up23arrow-down1·1 year agoSo does JPEG. It doesn’t mean that people (will) use it for that.
minus-squareMower2560@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoActually? I didnt know that. Is it used often? Any downsides ?
minus-squarefilcuk@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up7·1 year agoPractically never because it’s rubbish. The only possible use is on old precision machines that don’t support newer standards, like medical imaging.
Quality loss? Webp supports lossless.
So does JPEG. It doesn’t mean that people (will) use it for that.
Actually? I didnt know that. Is it used often? Any downsides ?
Practically never because it’s rubbish. The only possible use is on old precision machines that don’t support newer standards, like medical imaging.