Bonus issue:

This one is a little bit less obvious

    • qaz@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      9 hours ago

      People often use a ridiculous amount of emoji’s in their readme, perhaps seeing it was a README triggered something in the LLM to talk like a readme?

    • Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Oh, I can help! 🎉

      1. computers like lists, they organize things.
      2. itemized things are better when linked! 🔗
      3. I hate myself a little for writing this out 😐
    • coherent_domain@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      My conspricy theory is that early LLMs have a hard time figuring out the logical relation between sentenses, hence do not generate good transitions between sentences.

      I think bullet point might be manually tuned up by the developers, but not inheritly present in the model; because we don’t tend to see bullet points that much in normal human communications.

  • FQQD! @lemmy.ohaa.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    Wow, this just hurts. The “twice, I might add!” is sooooo fucking bad. I don’t have any words for this.

  • salmoura@lemmy.eco.br
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    The emoji littering in fastapi’s documentation actually drove me away from using it.

  • Korne127@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    20 hours ago

    I mean, even if it’s annoying someone obviously used AI, they probably still have that problem and just suck at communicating that themselves

    • qaz@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      19 hours ago

      They don’t, because it’s not an actual issue for any human reading it. The README contains the data and the repo is just for coordination, but the LLM doesn’t understand that.

      • Korne127@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        38 minutes ago

        Then… that’s so fucking weird, why would someone make that issue? I genuinely lack the understanding for how this could have happened in that case.

        • qaz@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          36 minutes ago

          I’m pretty sure it’s an automated system that makes these issues. The accounts looked like bots. However, that only makes it even weirder.