TechCodex@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 1 year agoWould you agree?programming.devimagemessage-square110fedilinkarrow-up1666arrow-down1147
arrow-up1519arrow-down1imageWould you agree?programming.devTechCodex@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square110fedilink
minus-squarealcasa@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 year agoWindows Server is rather common in large enterprise software. All the stuff you pray you never have to interface with
minus-squareAsudox@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·1 year agoIt sure is convenient. You get a user friendly GUI. But the stability, the resource intensity and the spyware. It’s really a retarded decision to build your servers on Windows Server.
minus-squaremsage@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoYes, but some software, and it’s usually a financial application, requires a Windows Server. I’ve seen it more than once, as I had to set up the machine, I was dying inside, but there was just no alternative that the accounting could use.
Windows Server is rather common in large enterprise software. All the stuff you pray you never have to interface with
It sure is convenient. You get a user friendly GUI. But the stability, the resource intensity and the spyware. It’s really a retarded decision to build your servers on Windows Server.
Yes, but some software, and it’s usually a financial application, requires a Windows Server.
I’ve seen it more than once, as I had to set up the machine, I was dying inside, but there was just no alternative that the accounting could use.