cm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 2 years agoJunior Prompt Engineeringlemmy.mlexternal-linkmessage-square54linkfedilinkarrow-up1766arrow-down18cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1758arrow-down1external-linkJunior Prompt Engineeringlemmy.mlcm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 2 years agomessage-square54linkfedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareOrvorn@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up86·2 years agoSomeone should invent some kind of database of syntax, like a… code
minus-squareheavydust@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up40·2 years agoBut it would need to be reliable with a syntax, like some kind of grammar.
minus-squarepeoplebeproblems@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up27·2 years agoThat’s great, but then how do we know that the grammar matches what we want to do - with some sort of test?
minus-squareNatanael@infosec.publinkfedilinkarrow-up23·2 years agoHow to we know what to test? Maybe with some kind of specification?
minus-squaremaiskanzler@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 years agoPeople could give things a name and write down what type of thing it is.
minus-squareKnock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up11·2 years agoWe don’t want anything amateur. It has to be a professional codegrammar.
Someone should invent some kind of database of syntax, like a… code
But it would need to be reliable with a syntax, like some kind of grammar.
That’s great, but then how do we know that the grammar matches what we want to do - with some sort of test?
How to we know what to test? Maybe with some kind of specification?
People could give things a name and write down what type of thing it is.
A codegrammar?
We don’t want anything amateur. It has to be a professional codegrammar.