For years now, there has been some concern about the coziness between technology companies and the government. Whether a company complies with casual government requests for data, requires a warrant, or even fights overly-broad warrants has been a canary in the digital coal mine during an era where...
do you think the us is the only state that works with corps to surveil?
I get bored of lazy titles and USian sefaultism.
? eff has international reach and the article applies everywhere. it was clearly intentionally written to apply anywhere. your comment makes no sense.
But if they acknowledged that, how would they be able to high road people?!?
Isn’t the article specifically referring to the USA government here?
it is certainly spurred by the developing situation in the us and has examples from it, but otherwise nothing applie only to the us. and the us finalizing it going to shit effects you anywhere in the world.
Thank you. My apologies for being a twat.